Communication is everywhere. We may first think of formal media - like the one you're reading now - but everything has the ability to send messages that help us make meaning from our world.


Here you'll read about the myriad ways people transmit, receive and interact with information in all aspects of our lives. So drop in, and hang out for a spell. Better still, join the conversation: submit your comment using the "Comments" link at the end of each post.


Want to communicate with Michelle or SimplyRead?


__________________________________________________________________________________
Showing posts with label Dora and the Brandish Invasion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dora and the Brandish Invasion. Show all posts

More 'o' Dora...and discussion of intellectual property


Ok, I'll try to make this my last one on this topic, despite how easy quarry poor Dora and her ilk are!

Last week I took my own picture of a Dora chocolate. Since then, I've been wondering if my post violates their trademark. I DID take it myself, and could say that someone took it not knowing about the trademark notice engraved into her back (after all, my hub did eat that part before I took the photo). BUT, I did then go on to make much of that engraving in my post. Hmmm...

On one hand, people post photos of the Dora character in the thousands; eBay alone likely has about 100 different photos people have taken of the huge range of no-longer-loved (or never-opened) Dora toys available. Are they violating copyright or trademark? Strictly speaking, probably, because they're reproducing the image for their own gain.

When I wrote my first missive on what has become the "Dora series," I Googled for Dora images, thinking I'd use one to liven things up. But then, I thought I'd be violating trademark / copyright law, and as a professional communicator that's against my ethics. But, am I any less guilty if I take my own photo? Where does trademark protection end?

For example, I used to work with someone who followed a strict sense of ethics in preserving the brand of the company we worked for, but would still copy images of other companies' logos from their Web sites for posting on our intranet. He didn't think this was an issue, likely since it boosted that other company's brand recognition. But he better than anyone knew that in many cases any alteration of the image's size or dimensions could water down or otherwise negatively represent their brand.

I've also been thinking of copyright for info that appears here in this blog. Does anyone out there know whether any blog posting can appear in future as an article in another medium? I'm assuming that, since this was clearly traceable back to me, the ideas belong to me.

But now that it's "out there," I know no-one can represent it as their own (yeah, like that's gonna happen anyway), do I have permission to do anything else with it? Say I wanted to develop a blog entry into a longer article, for instance.

If you're one of my two-point-five readers, and can shed any light on this, I'd like to hear about it. (And TIA!)

Branded holidays: chocolate Dora



I keep trying to get off this subject, but keep being given more fodder for my battle against the Brandish Invasion.

Th Easter holiday just came through our home, via chocolate confection and new spring clothes for our daughter, K. We observe Passover, too, and both holidays came during the same week this year.

The pictured chocolate Dora arrived via K's grandmother, my mom. You see it in it's partially-eaten form.

Everyone knows we can choose from many shapes molded from chocolate each year. Even when I was a kid, there were chocolate Bugs Bunnies, aside the more traditional, "generic" ones. Now, there's likely more selection between characters. I like to think there are still just as many kids who are just happy to have a huge piece of chocolate to devour, and therefore don't care that they don't recognize the bunny or chicken (not that it matters, since within seconds it will likely be missing an ear).

In explaining my current brand bugaboo, the photo doesn't do the job I'd hoped it would do - my husband ate the part I really wanted to photograph. This part was the back side of the chocolate Dora. Engraved into the back - before David at it! - were the year and trademark information for the Dora character. My daughter's Easter treat had quite literally been branded.

The proverbial (cash) cow for the nice folks at Nick Jr., even this rendering of the beloved Dora had to remind us that someone had created her. If we as humans did this, I'd be walking around with my mom's name and the year I was born carved into my back.

I would have liked to ask K if she'd noticed the letters and numbers on Dora's back. But then, she wasn't all that concerned about biting off Dora's feet straight away. So I think (and hope) the branding would have escaped her, too.

p.s. Apologies if this photo ends up dwarfing my post - first time adding one!

It's another step in this blog's evolution...I welcome your comments to turn this blog into a conversation you'll want to keep being part of!

The Brandish Invasion - the saga continues

This past Saturday was my daughter's third birthday. Her grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins were all here. By the time they'd left, more than ten items bearing the image of Dora the Explorer had entered the building, along with a few of cohorts Winnie the Pooh (Disney version, natch), Pixar's Nemo and Thomas the Tank Engine.

I cannot write a long blog this week - too busy figuring out where all this stuff is going to go. Also, at the risk of sounding ungrateful, from here on in we'll be strategizing about how to influence the buying tendencies of our family so that our household is not so overwhelmed by the invasion of marketing in future.

(And for the environmental and anti-consumer movements - group I am beginning to identify with - this move will help cut down on the amount of new plastic and packaging that are created while these items are produced.) Garage sales and barter exchanges, here we come!

Anything to reduce the amount of physical and spiritual junk we end up having to manage, including the impact on our daughter. We want her to understand that life is about much more than recognizing your favourite cartoon characters on everything you own.

Dora and The Brandish Invasion

As I finally come down from a day that included the din of weekend mall buzz, it seems a suitable time to put down some thoughts on the current state of the brand. And since I spent that mall time with a three-year-old, I am viewing it mostly through the lens of the parent.

My daughter’s is certainly not the first generation to experience what I now call The Brandish Invasion. It's been thus to varying degrees, oh, since during my parents' childhoods, from the moment the ray of the first television broadcast sliced through the dullness of their winter living rooms.

But in this time, where you can receive the same "experience" transmitted through multiple media, it's escalated to ridiculous proportions. I’ll focus the discussion by looking at the ways a single, well-drawn kids' television character has grown into the merchandising monster that ate Manhattan: I give you Dora the Explorer.

Basic definitions

Obviously the title of this blog entry is a play on the expression British Invasion. When I added the suffix “ish” to “brand”, it occurred to me that it could be confusing, since “brandish” is an entirely separate word. But as it turns out, it fits: when I look up the word "brandish," on dictionary.com, the first definition that appears says it means 1. to shake or wave, as a weapon; and 2. a flourish or waving, as of a weapon.

I have no problem equating the Dora empire with a formidable weapon. And, by extension, I cannot sometimes help feeling like brands continue to invade my personal space, and jab away at my efforts to keep my daughter from feeling the urgent pull of product at an inappropriately young age. Like that brandished weapon, Dora’s creators have done all they can to thrust and wave her in our faces.

After all, it's now possible to meet Dora in our travels through the media of VHS, DVD (both movies and games), CD, TV, and Web - I'm sure I've missed some more edgy examples, having never set thumb on a game controller. When I'm shopping with my daughter for her everyday needs - like food, art supplies, and almost anything in the paper products category – within minutes I’ll be stared down by Dora’s permanently widened, Anime-reminiscent eyes. Or, more often, Kyra does, since all placement of Dora products usually happens at her eye level.

Dora’s ever-expansive buddha-like mug can sneak up on us anywhere: on fruit snack boxes, cereal, most kids' clothing items and accessories, diapers, bubble bath, sheets, headboards, cereal, books, kids' drink containers, toboggans, cutlery, lollipops, cheesy tabletop clocks...and sadly, I admit that my daughter owns many of these; others she fought admirably to get, too, but my will was stronger on those days.

Even outside the kids’ product aisles, I have to stay ever-vigilant for cross-promotion efforts (Dora drain opener, anyone?). And now they’ve spun off the character of her cousin, Diego, securing the other half of the kid population with a male character little boys will presumably want to emulate.

Originally, we'd embraced Dora – along with Sesame Street – thinking it's good for her to experience media at reasonable doses, provided she’ll actually gain some valuable learning from it. If you strip away all the “stuff” attached to her, Dora and her friends teach some pretty cool lessons about teamwork, solving problems and accepting other languages and cultures. Kyra has even learned some basic Spanish thanks to the show, which I now have picked up and run with, since I speak it, too.

Watching shows about her cousin, Diego, we’ve learned about unusual rainforest creatures and adopt an environmental mindset as we join animal rescuer Diego in his adventures. Of course, this narrative has its shadow side, too. For example, I wonder if child labour advocates have ever asked why neither Dora nor Diego is seen spending much time in school. But I digress…we’ll do Foucault on another day.

Avoiding commercials doesn't fully protect you

I should note that we don’t actually watch any of these kids’ stories on television proper, but rather on DVDs and VHS tapes. It’s our conscious decision that – eschewing the APA warnings about TV for kids – we’ll at least control exactly what she watches and designate TV viewing time as a specific chance to enjoy and learn together, rather than random or “background noise” phenomemon. And, we favour DVDs over, say Treehouse, in order to control the amount of needless information thrust in front of our child. But the marketers are one step ahead of us there, too.

Before you can view the menu on a DVD, you must be ready with your clicker to skip through between 2 and 8 promotional spots. Some are for other stories about the same character we’re watching, and others are for other well-known kids’ shows under the Nick Jr. banner. You cannot skip through these – at least, not with my player – without seeing at least the first couple seconds of each promo. Fortunately, my daughter has gotten used to this and sees this as “the way mommy or daddy starts the Dora movie.”

In almost all cases, the makers have added a feature that prevents viewers from skipping certain parts, such as the copyright warning. In others, it’s even more nefarious. Take Sesame Street, the long admired, seemingly untouchable paragon of educational virtue. Did you know that many of their DVDs contain an introductory vignette about all the good work they’re doing around the world? Fine. It makes sense for them to brag – they’ve earned it.

BUT, did you know that they DON’T LET YOU SKIP THROUGH their bragfest?!? To me, that’s just low: and the message I get is that methinks the producers doth protest too much about how wonderful they are, given their need to shove that message in our faces each time we want to enjoy counting with The Count.

As a communications consultant, I have been responsible professionally for promoting and supporting brands over the years. But I was never given such pause about the subject of brands – and their twin supporters, merchandising and marketing – until I attempted to prevent someone from encountering one, as I now do with my daughter. All I can do is limit her to only a few television characters, and hope that this will in turn limit the amount of useless and/or overpriced stuff that ends up in my house, on those days when I give up on arguing with a toddler. Unfortunately, I cannot control what the kids at school have on their T-shirts and lunchboxes. And on those rainy afternoons where they let the kids chill with a DVD, she’s learned to recognize many other kids’ characters we keep out of our home.

How I deal on my own time

As an adult, one assumes that I have more critical judgment about how marketing and branding affect my interests. And as such, I am alert to the invasion of advertising into my personal space. Each time a commercial comes on TV or radio, I immediately mute, fast-forward or change stations. Bottom line: I am tired of being yelled at in my own house – have you noticed how the ads are usually a couple volume levels higher than the show you’re watching?.

Car dealer and furniture stores are the worst for screaming through their copy – and then there are those monster truck rallies! – as though if you don’t get there right away to see that truck crush another, buy their particleboard table, or scoop that “midnight madness” bargain on a jeep, your life is as good as overwith.

With brands and products weaving their way through almost all encounters we have in a day, I no longer have the patience for it once within the cocoon of my home. And I will remain ever so when it comes to what is put in front of my child, especially within our own four walls. ‘Cause once we step outside them, we’re all much fairer game.

-end